ASUS ET900N G3 Price: US Resellers List DGX Station Build From $111,999.99

The ASUS ExpertCenter Pro ET900N G3, the company's build of NVIDIA's DGX Station, is listed at $111,999.99 by Central Computers and at $113,998.86 by SabrePC, as read on Nov. 4, 2026. ASUS publishes no list price.

These are the first US prices for the ASUS tower in Voltgrid's coverage. Our Nov. 1 DGX Station review found a list price from Dell but none from ASUS, and our Oct. 24 report set out the platform: one GB300 superchip, 252 GB of HBM3e and 1,600 W of system power. Central Computers marks its ET900N G3-2SSD-V2 available but quote-only, and SabrePC shows its PRO ET900N G3-2SSD out of stock.

Where the ASUS Price Sits Against MSI, Exxact and Dell

Rival GB300 towers, read the same day, bracket it. Exxact's Valence DGX Station shows a starting price of $98,450.00 on its own site; the page does not state the storage or card in that base price. Per the Nov. 4 update to our DGX Station review, Newegg lists MSI's XpertStation WS300 at $99,999.00 as a request-a-quote listing, out of stock. Dell's Pro Precision with GB300 still shows $160,195.00 for its default build, which adds an RTX PRO 2000 display card and 16 TB of SSDs. ASUS's spec sheet says its tower ships with two 2 TB drives, so the builds differ.

Notebookcheck had reported $99,999 at Central Computers in a story updated Oct. 5, without saying when that price was read or for which model, so the two figures do not show a price change.

StorageReview found the ASUS within 2% of MSI's WS300 on 24 of 28 vLLM tests and said this second build of NVIDIA's reference platform confirms the first. StorageReview's results show near-identical throughput on most tests; neither the listings nor the review say what the price difference pays for.

Nemotron 120B Throughput Measured on the ASUS

The most detailed public run of a 120B model on the ASUS comes from YouTube creator Alex Ziskind, in a video published July 30. The machine was a loaner; in an Oct. 7 video with Level1Techs he said it had to go back to ASUS. A 70-second Short cut from the first video followed on Aug. 15.

He ran NVIDIA's Nemotron 3 Super 120B in NVFP4, NVIDIA's own 4-bit format, and kept adding simultaneous requests. One request ran at about 180 tokens per second. Combined output then read 250 at two requests, 400 at eight, over 800 at 16, 1,000 at 32, 1,500 at 64 and 2,600 at 128.

Those are totals across all requests, not what each user sees. Above one request, Ziskind gave no per-request speed and said only that each request takes a bit longer. He credited continuous batching: the GPU groups waiting requests into one pass, so the total climbs while each request slows. He did not disclose the serving engine, its version, or the prompt and output lengths. No lab has published a run of the same model, quantization and tool on the ASUS, so his figures cannot be set beside lab results.

His power readings came from monitoring software on the machine, not a wall meter. With one coding agent, nvtop showed up to about 715 W and about 550 W on average. In a separate agent test, his dashboard showed about 750 W with 16 agents, 900 W with 64 and about 1,000 W at most with 128. In the October video, the same unit idled at 319 W, read on the battery station powering it.

StorageReview's lab run, published Sept. 23, states its conditions: vLLM, 512-token prompts, 512-token answers and aggregate output. On the ASUS, MiniMax M2.7 in NVFP4 went from 214 tokens per second on one stream to 4,793 on 128, and DeepSeek V4 Flash in FP8 from 152 to 1,766 at 32 streams. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B in NVFP4 peaked at 159 against the MSI's 168, 5.2% lower; StorageReview calls every figure a single run on each tower and does not pin the gap on the chassis. The lab removed the RTX PRO 2000 card ASUS had fitted and did not measure power.

ASUS ET900N G3 Specs: Storage, Power Supply and Memory

ASUS's spec sheet settles, for its model, the storage conflict our review left open. It lists two M.2 slots at PCIe 5.0 x4, set up as a RAID 1 pair for the operating system, plus two PCIe 6.0 x4 slots for training data. That matches ServeTheHome's table for the MSI WS300, not NVIDIA's listing of four Gen5 slots.

The power supply is a 1,600 W Titanium-rated ATX unit; ServeTheHome lists a Platinum-rated 1,600 W supply in the MSI. ASUS's North American listing is 125 V AC with an IEC C19 to NEMA 5-20P cord, which it lists as optional, and says maximum power output depends on the input voltage and the cord; NVIDIA requires a 20 A circuit. StorageReview notes two carry handles and a fan aimed at the ConnectX-8 optics. ASUS claims about 50 dB in Auto Mode at full load without a graphics card, a figure no lab has checked.

The memory figure has changed too. ASUS's CES release on Jan. 7 gave 775 GB of coherent memory. Its June 15 launch release and spec page give 748 GB, and NVIDIA's own figure fell the same way.

How the 748 GB Memory Pool Works

The 748 GB is two memory pools, not one. ASUS lists 252 GB of HBM3e, memory stacked beside the GPU, at 7.1 TB/s, and 496 GB of LPDDR5X on the Grace CPU at 396 GB/s. NVLink-C2C, the chip-to-chip link, joins them, and NVIDIA lists it at 900 GB/s (StorageReview calls that bidirectional). The link lets the GPU read the CPU's pool directly.

A model that fits in the 252 GB stays in the fast pool. A larger one spills into the slower pool. StorageReview ran GLM-5.2 in NVFP4 with about 215 GB of expert weights in Grace memory and measured 35 output tokens per second for one stream on vLLM. The 748 GB sets which models load, and the 252 GB at 7.1 TB/s sets which can stay in the fast pool.

What to watch

ASUS still ships Ubuntu with NVIDIA's developer tools and says Windows support is planned, with no Windows model listed. NVIDIA said on Oct. 21 that DGX Station for Windows is expected from partners in December, and that systems are expected to begin shipping later this year from ASUS, Dell Technologies, GIGABYTE, HP, MSI and Supermicro. ASUS's support page lists one BIOS, version 0402 from June 10, and BMC firmware 1.6.55 from Sept. 29 as the newest, without change notes. Still missing are an ASUS list price, a full-load wall-power measurement from any lab, and the engine and settings behind Ziskind's numbers.